△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

Must everything be optimized for search?

Search Engine Optimization—SEO—is critical. Your content won’t influence anything if people can’t find it.

Now that I’ve gotten that out of the way, I have to ask: Does absolutely every nugget of online content need to be optimized for search?

I just finished delivering the morning keynote at a healthcare conference focusing on social media. During the Q&A, I was asked about the deleterious affect involvement in social media has on all the efforts of the marketing staff to ensure their content is well optimized.

I sat down after my talk, fired up my laptop, and checked Twitter to find a link to a WebProNews piece by Chris Crum titled, “Social Media Will Not Replace Search.” The piece digs into some Nielsen research. Crum says, “Your friends may not have all the answers you seek. Furthermore, if you are asking people you don’t know, why would you trust them any more than search results?”

A couple days ago, I read a SearchEngineWatch post by SEO PR’s Greg Jarboe, who dismissed the Social Media News Release (SMNR) because Google News doesn’t index them. My answer to Greg: Are cars a failure because they don’t fly? Flying is not something a car was ever designed to do, just as SEO was never a goal of the SMNR. While HubSpot’s research showed that distributed SMNRs don’t get indexed to the degree that traditional releases do, the goal of the SMNR is increased coverage by reporters and bloggers who will find the release either because they have been personally directed to it or they found the link in the traditional release or on the company’s website.

(Incidentally, my disagreement with Greg in the post’s comments has led to a new friendship. Disagreements don’t need to be confrontational or disagreeable.)

Search is important, but not everyone online is searching all the time. People don’t need to find the communities in which they already participate or the blogs they already read. If you create a widget that bloggers can embed in their own blogs to share with their readers, the widget itself produces no SEO benefits for your organization at all. Yet it creates visibility for your organization among readers of a blog who you want to reach.

Believe me, I’m not minimizing the importance of search. But how well content can be optimized, or whether it can be optmized at all, is not the only criteria for determining whether the content has value.

Comments
  • 1.I agree to some extent, but I think it's important to look at the actual ratio of people finding and acting on links via both search and social media, and also to target that to the market in question. Certainly there's been a rush to suggest search is already dead by a lot of us in digital employment, when actually it's far from true.

    The other point I wanted to make is that a huge number of the widgets that you mention for embedding on blogs etc will all contain a backlink to the originating site, therefore most definitely carrying an SEO benefit - indeed sometime for entirely unrelated sites to the content in question.

    I totally agree that the quality and aims of content should be considered before optimisation - what use is optimising something which serves no purpose even if it attracts people to your site etc, but good quality content badly optimised is going to have to get extremely lucky to meet the goals most people would have for most projects.

    Dan Thornton | October 2009 | Peterborough, UK

  • 2.This is a refreshing post - lately SEO has been the only validating factor for some of my online-based clients in terms of PR success. I completely understand that SEO is important to their business but what happened to visibility & exposure, period? At the end of the day, what really matters is if you're engaging and a part of a community that matters to your industry and business, and providing good/relevant content for that audience - if you are, then a consumer will take the time to look you up and won't need to rely on the (albeit handy) hyperlink embedded in the article.

    Audrey Craipain | October 2009 | San Francisco

  • 3.In a word: Yes.

    See also: AHA:// The primary form of expression must always be a question!

    However, if you had asked "Does absolutely every nugget of online content need to be optimized for Google?" then I would equally unequivocally answer: No.

    Many / most people do not understand that Google is no longer an effective search engine -- it is now an advertising agency.

    :) nmw

    Norbert Mayer-Wittmann | October 2009 | online

Comment Form

« Back