△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

Change is the ultimate measure of online influence

imageWhat is influence?

I’ve been mulling over this question since reading Steve Rubel’s post asserting the Google Page Rank is the ultimate measure of online influence. I drr Steve’s point, particularly when comparing Google Page Rank to other metrics that draw on server-based data.

Like Technorati’s authority rankings, your Google Page Rank improves the more people link to you. There’s a nuts-and-bolts problem with this as a measure of influence: You don’t know why people are linking to you. Sure, you hope they’re directing their own readers to what they consider to be high-quality content. In any given case, though, it’s also possible that they’re linking to you while telling their readers, “You won’t believe what this idiot has written now.” I frequently follow links deliberately directing me to examples of bad content.

Another problem with page rank is the ease with which the unscrupulous can game the system. Not too long ago, I started moderating comments to this blog so I could reject Akismet-proof comment spam that includes a link designed to boost a site’s Google Page Rank.

But these technical issues aren’t at the core of my discomfort with Page Rank as a measure of influence. It’s the definition of influence, which has nothing to do with your popularity. Influence happens when you cause something to happen. Page Rank is an outcome of your efforts, the social media equivalent of counting the number of newspapers that pick up your press release. Influence occurs when you produce outcomes, not outputs.

Katie Paine, in her excellent book, “Measuring Public Relationships,” defines outcomes as “quantifiable changes in attitudes, behaviors, or opinions that occur as end results of a PR program.” It’s a definition I agree with. The highest possible Google Page Rank cannot determine whether your site has produced such a quantifiable change. That’s what influence is—the ability to alter someone’s attitudes, behaviors, or opinions.

Measuring your ouputs—along with outtakes (the perceptions or understanding created by your work)—is important, but it’s a communication goal, not a business goal; you measure it to determine how effective your tactics have been at meeting the business goal. Ultimately, companies have business goals in mind when they employ PR.

Unfortunately, the ultimate measure of online influence isn’t accessible from any of the online metrics or analytics available. You can’t plug a URL into a search field and produce the answer. There are three basic ways to assess your influence online:

  • Read and analyze what people are saying about you to determine whether attitudes or opinions have changed as a result of your online efforts
  • Apply some kind of survey mechanism to ask people whether your content drove some kind of change in the people who consumed it
  • If a direct link can be made, measure the impact of your content on the business goal; for example, where the goal is to get people to sign up for an online service, you could show that a blogger outreach effort produced a measurable increase in signups

The difference between Page Rank and these three approaches should be pretty clear when you look at what you report to your client. Which would you rather say?

Option #1: Sixty-seven percent of the people who read your blog were more likely to do business with than they were before they started reading it, and 28% said they’ve already done business with you because of the thought leadership you’ve established on the blog. That’s significant, given that our online efforts have generated a Google Page Rank of 7, which means a lot of people are linking to the blog, dramatically boosting the number of customers and prospective customers.

Option #2: We’ve generated a Google Page Rank of 7. That means a lot of people are linking to the site. Isn’t that awesome?

If we’re not working to achieve our clients’ or employers’ business objectives, there’s no reason for our clients or employers to pay us. If that’s not what we’re measuring, we’re not demonstrating the value of our work. Yes, assess your Page Rank. But for goodness’ sake, don’t stop there.

Comments
  • 1.greetings. my name is Jono Dawosn. i am doing an annotated bibliography for my Wintec research methods class .my topic is corporate blogs. i read your blogging for business book, it was very nice.
    i too have a blog, i had to make one for another class. be keen if you had a look at it. my adress is jonotoday.blogspot.com, havnt wirtten anything for a while, but i do love to blog.

    anyway i was wondering if you could possibly forward me any information considering corporate blogs that i could include in my bibliography. i t would be of great help and i would be forever in your debt

    Joon | October 2008

  • 2.Hi Shel

    Agree completely that online influence measurement is more complex than just Page Rank. Influence is relative to the audience that you are looking to engage and therefore relatively low ranking websites could be highly influential within particular target markets. It also relates to the readership of that site. If, say, the readership/traffic is small but made up of decision makers in the particular industry then such a site could be highly influential but have a low page rank in absolute terms.

    Adam Parker | October 2008

  • 3.Hi Shel,
    I don't even know you, but I could kiss you for this. I'll spare you that, but will say thanks for posting.

    What I think often gets missed in these determinations of influence is the HUMAN factor that truly drives impactful, influential relationships. I don't have a relationship with you or your URL, and I'm not influenced by your status (or lack thereof) on the web.

    What influences me is what you have to say, do, or contribute to something bigger than yourself. It's a measure of trust, of respect. And I can't determine that from just a pile of links that, to your point, don't tell me WHY you're linking, just that you are.

    I'd much rather turn around and be able to point to something tangible that someone did or said because of my contributions to the world or to their business. It's harder to put your finger on sometimes, but it's something of value that can't always be measured with a single ruler. In fact, many of the most powerful terms - trust, respect, influence, affection - often can't be measured concretely, anyway.

    Thanks for making sure we're paying attention to the aspects of influence that matter more than what Google says.

    Amber Naslund | October 2008 | Chicago, IL

  • 4.Hi, Shel. Thanks for this thoughtful post. It seems like the old clip-counting argument has moved online, with Google Page Rank as the digital version of Ad Dollar Equivalents. There is no substitute, as you have rightly pointed out, for the research necessary to determine if your communications programs -- whether print, broadcast, online, or just in the ether -- are changing people's behavior in some positive way relative to the client.

    It's what folks like Katie Paine have been arguing for decades. You don't measure PR results (or online social media results) by how many clips or links or backlinks you get. You measure it the old-fashioned way, by asking people in pre-research how they feel about the client and then in post-research to find out if their opinions have shifted.

    It's good to hear some common sense communications discipline intrude on the echo chamber once in a while! Thanks...

    Steven Lubetkin | October 2008 | Cherry Hill, NJ

  • 5.PR is a heavy factor is determining the value of a website based on a neutral 3rd party. People trust Googz and trust their methods (even though it can be a headache sometimes for SEO professionals.)

    The only people who whine about PR are those who don?t have it.

    Measure Page Rank | January 2009

Comment Form

« Back