△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

The need for speed in clearing blog comments

There is an expectation in the blogosphere—and not an unreasonable one—that bloggers will check their blogs frequently and clear out their comment moderation queues quickly in order to keep the dialogue fresh and current. As businesses expand their presence in the blogosphere, they appear to be doing so at corporate speeds, not blog speeds. That’s a mistake. The blogosphere will not adapt to the pace of business.

Two recent incidents show the hazards associated with the usual business response times. First, Direct2Dell, the Dell Computers blog, has been criticized for withholding negative posts and getting some information up to the blog—such as the battery recall—concurrent with the announcement through normal channels. More recently, McDonald’s has taken heat for not clearing negative comments to its Open for Discussion blog that focuses on corporate social responsibility. A post on the blog responded to crticism aimed at the company for including a HumVee toy as a Happy Meal item, part of a promotion with Hummer maker GM. Comments appeared a day later.

In both cases, the desired items and comments eventually appeared. But did they appear in response to blogger outrage decrying apparent corporate censorship?

I don’t know the answer for certain, but having spent 15 years working for Fortune 500 companies, I suspect not. My guess is that nobody is dedicated 100% full-time to these blogs, and clearing moderation queues is something that is gotten around to when time permits and higher priority tasks have been completed. That’s just the way businesses try to handle these kinds of activities: “I know you’re already working full-time, but now we’d like you to manage our highly visible corporate blog, too. But don’t let your other responsibilities slide.”

It’s easy to see why corporations wouldn’t want to dedicate a full salary, benefits, and other associated costs to an employee who will do nothing but blog. (Although it’s not unheard of, either, as in the case of Stonyfield Farms.) But when a business is unable to respond quickly enough to meet the minimum requirements that have emerged as a standard for responding in the blogosphere, the company’s blog could wind up doing more harm than good.

Of course, even among us individual bloggers, it’s not always possible to respond as quickly as we’d like. However, companies are not individuals. It doesn’t seem unreasonable to expect a company that has started a blog to commit the resources to maintain it, which includes reviewing comments in the moderation queue in a timely manner.

For those who are counseling their companies and clients to blog, it’s important to explain the commitment as well as the rationale. If the organization isn’t willing to make that commitment, an alternative means of ensuring comments are addressed effectively are not available, it’s probably better to hold off on blogging until the organization grasps the benefits in terms of the expense of time and resources. It’s just not worth it having high-profile bloggers lambaste you for censorship when you really just haven’t had the time to get to it.

Comments
  • 1.This is a great point, Shel. It's yet another thing companies need to consider before they decide to launch a blog. It can be a big timesuck -- not just the writing of the posts, but the participation stuff: moderating comments, responding to comments, reading other blogs, participating in other blogs, etc.

    Carmen Van Kerckhove | September 2006 | New York, NY

  • 2.Excellent post, Shel. I was just discussing this with a client yesterday -- the importance of allowing comments, moderating them and keeping up with them!

    donna papacosta | September 2006 | Toronto

  • 3.Moderating legitimate comments is time-consuming enough; another thing to prepare companies about is spam. I moderate comments directed to my IABC Cafe blog posts, and have to delete at least 80% of them as spam. I sometimes do this over lunch, or after work, and I worry about someone passing by and catching a glimpse of the lewd and rude spam topics. People have been fired for viewing porn at work; I don't want a coworker--or boss--to think that's what I'm doing.

    Tom Keefe | September 2006 | Libertyville, IL

  • 4.Did you hear about the flack Dell got when it delayed responding to negative posts and getting some information up to the blog—such as the battery recall for their "burning" laptops?   How about MacDonalds' having taken heat for not clearing negative comments to its Open for...

  • 5.You brought up an excellent point about Corporate blogs - they have to be looked at constantly - not just when someone gets around to it.

    I see just what your talking about as most companies are just getting their feet wet with blogs and don't have the resources to hire someone just for that, like you said. But if they have something high profile - maybe they should go and hire people to respond to blog posts in a timely way.

    webmetricsguru | September 2006 | New York

Comment Form

« Back