△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

MySpace, YouTube now off limits to U.S. soldiers

It’s ironic, isn’t it, that the Lulu Blooker prize for for books based on blogs went to an American soldier writing an account of his time in Iraq at about the same time the U.S. military has blocked its soldiers’ access to resources like MySpace and YouTube.

The book, “My War: Killing Time in Iraq, by Colby Buzzell,” may be the last “frank and open military blog book,” according to Blooker judging chair Paul Jones, quoted in a BBC article.

A Department of Defense policy set to go into effect today will block military access worldwide to 13 popular websites, most of them examples of social media. The rationale, according to Gen. B.B. Bell, the U.S. Forces Korea commander, is protection of information and reduction of drag on the department’s networks.

The complete list: Metacafe, IFilm, StupidVideos, and FileCabi, the social networking sites MySpace, BlackPlanet and Hi5, music sites Pandora, MTV, and 1.fm, and live365 (the Internet radio site), and the photo-sharing site Photobucket.


“These actions were taken to enhance and increase network security and protect the use of the bandwidth,” according to Pentagon spokesman Col. Gary Keck. All this on the heels of another effort to curtail soldier blogging.

What crap.

When I spoke about a year ago to a group of U.S. Army public information officers, I was asked how I would deal with the negative publicity associated with the release of the Turkish film, “Valley of the Wolves, which portrayed U.S. soldiers and evil and bloodthirsty. “Simple,” I said. “Get a bunch of soliders’ blogs together and aggregate them on a single page where anybody can see that these soldiers are real live human beings with families and opinions and lives. There’s no better way to dispel the two-dimensional myth than with the observations of flesh-and-blood three-dimensional people.”

They liked that idea. They evidently get very far with it.

This is consistent with the views of Noah Schachtman, writing for a Wired magazine blog, in which he said, “This is as much an information war as it is bombs and bullets, and (the Pentagon is) muzzling their best voices.”

But it’s not just a matter of the soldiers being able to express themselves to the world. For some time, deployed soldiers have had few channels to communicate with loved ones other than the Net. When my son, Benjamin, was first sent to Iraq with the 101st Airborne, our only contact with him initially was a rare and brief phone call. This was during the initial invasion. But after he was garrisoned at Mosul (after President Bush pronounced “Mission Accomplished”), we spent hours with him as he IM’d us from the cybercafe set up at the base.

Today, soldiers have adopted a wider array of social media tools than just IM. They upload their videos to YouTube (and their families do the same for them) and they communicate with friends and families via the message boards and friends feature of social networking sites like MySpace.

All of which is being yanked away from them. Rather than address security through other means (which could be a specious issue to begin with—is it really a matter of security or one of the military hearing things they don’t like? After all, it’s already a serious crime to pass along military secrets using any channel) and simply increasing their bandwidth, they have shut down channels of communication that have a positive effect on soldiers and humanize our military to the audiences we’re trying to influence.

Don’t you just love it when the world’s biggest command-and-control organization goes head-to-head with the transparency of social media?

Comments
  • 1.I'm not seeing this in the same way you are. While I agree with your opinion of the value of keeping the information flowing from the soldiers, I don't think that's being challenged by this policy. If we're to believe that they're muzzling the soldiers' ability to communicate, you'd see blogger.com, 360.yahoo.com, etc. also on this list and they're not.

    My guess is that the IT folks looked at their system logs to see what domains were creating the most load and selected the ones that were not essential (popular doesn't equal essential). All the sites listed require a great deal of bandwidth.

    I don't see an effort to squelch the troops here. Just an effort to move them to lower bandwidth domains.

    Joe Beaulaurier | May 2007

  • 2.Hi Shel -
    First, I hope your son is okay, and, comes home safe.

    To Joe's point about bandwidth - it may in part be true, but, this ruling about the blocked websites is just one of the recent restrictions on soldiers' Internet use. See: http://snipurl.com/1kppy.

    I wrote about this same topic recently: http://snipurl.com/1j7mk (much to Strumpette's chagrin), and tend to agree with you, Shel, that listening to the soldiers' voices should be an essential part of how we think about and wage this war. (Obviously, anything posted online should adhere to secrecy rules, so as to not jeopardize American lives.)

    One of my best friends is a lt. col. in the Navy. He abhors these new rules. He told me:

    "If the American soldiers were free to blog about the horrors that they see every day, it would be another major scandal. People say that the mainstream media has a liberal bias? - Yet the truth on the ground in Iraq is far *worse* than the so-called 'liberal media' now show."

    I think a debate that is equally important would be: whether or not soldiers are allowed to blog/vlog, should we allow their voices to unduly influence public policy? There's a reason that the military reports to the country's civilian executive: in the Big Picture, we need to maintain that balance.

    Todd Defren | May 2007 | Today? Boston.

  • 3.Hi, Todd.

    Thanks for the thoughts. For the record, Ben was in the invasion force, a combat infantry soldier starting out in Kuwait and fighting his way up to Baghdad with the 101st, then garrisoned in Mosul. He came home after a year in Iraq and got out of the Army about six months after that. He just finished a one-year stint in the California National Guard and is about to take the entrance exams for the Alameda County Sherriff's Dept.

    Shel Holtz | May 2007 | DFW

  • 4.Glad to hear that Ben is a-okay. I look forward to trying to talk my way out of a speeding ticket next time I am zipping down I680 to the BestBuy in Dublin.

    Todd Defren | May 2007 | Boston

Comment Form

« Back