△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

Social media is not a car

car engineThere’s an age-old analogy that keeps coming up in social media talks I hear. “You don’t need to know how it works,” the analogy goes, “just like you don’t need to know how internal combustion works to drive a car.”

It’s a fine analogy for a consumer using social media. It doesn’t wash for communicators.

The very fact that communicators need such knowledge shouldn’t surprise anyone. Most communicators working 20 years ago, for instance, knew how an offset press worked so they could manage the production of the best possible publication. The inner workings of social media are no different. If print is giving way to digital, we need to have as thorough an understanding of digital tools as we had of print tools.

Without this intimate knowledge, our use of social channels will be limited to the most common uses to which everybody puts them. With such knowledge, it becomes easier to innovate compelling commicatins that influence people and produce results.

RSS and Posterous are two examples.

RSS

An increasingly loud chorus has proclaimed that RSS is dead. “I don’t need RSS any more,” the argument goes; “I get updated on all the information I need with Twitter. Twitter has replaced my RSS reader.”

Twitter hasn’t replaced my news reader, but I can understand why a lot of people feel this way. Nevertheless, what these folks really mean is that the consumer use of RSS—subscription to feeds via a reader—is dead. RSS itself is very much alive, a vibrant protocol that has been woven into the infrastructure of the Web. News moves through the Web largely because of RSS. Even more noteworthy, RSS is undergoing an evolution to accommodate the shift of the Web to a real-time environment.

RSSCloud and PubSubHubbub are two protocols that turn the current RSS model on its head. RSS readers poll all of the feeds to which the user has subscribed on a regular schedule—usually every hour—to see if any of the feeds have been updated. RSSCloud and PubSubHubbub notify users of any updates to feeds instantly, pushing the update to the reader rather than having the reader pull it.

Several services have embraced PubSubHubbub while every blog on Wordpress.com (the hosted version of WordPress) produces RSSCloud-compatible feeds.

So far, there’s only one reader that can take advantage of RSSCloud, but these are early days. The use of these protocols will improve your ability to deliver news and information instantly, whereas today you may produce it instantly, but delivery waits for a user’s reader to check for updates.

Buying into the inaccurate “RSS is dead” meme simply limits your opportunities to find new and innovative ways to deliver content as quickly as possible.

But understanding RSS opens possibilities beyond those presented by the most nascent technological developments. I’ve been working with a client looking for an easy way to deliver news to employees globally that allows employees to tailor the kind of news they get form the company—personnel news, product and brand news, industry news, and so on. Without much budget for expensive server options, I advised that they use a simple WordPress blog as the back end, creating separate categories and delivering the posts through RSS feeds delivered via the employee portal. It’s a simple solution that lets employees select news by category as well as geographic region. It helped to know RSS could do that, and that portal technology makes it drop-dead easy to incorporate feeds into portlets.

Posterous

As for Posterous, most of the people I talk with who know about the service get that it’s a ridiculously easy way to post just about anything to the Web. Some also get its potential for distribution of information. For example, everything I publish to Posterous is automatically tweeted (the headline is the tweet while the shortened URL links to the rest of the item I’ve posted.) But the Austin American Statesman’s use of Posterous was eye-opening. The newspaper invited readers to email photos showing how they were spending a 100-degree-plus day. More than 70 photos were submitted that were repurposed into a gallery on the newspaper’s website and a page of photos in the print edition. The experiment left editors hungry for more; they shared ideas for using Posterous to chronicle a local sports team’s season, for instance. Again, the potential is huge for soliciting content from readers and then repurposing it in the paper’s other outlets.

How could communicators use Posterous on behalf of employers and clients? You won’t be able to figure it out if you’re not aware of its capabilities.

Understanding the technology that makes communication channels work isn’t rocket science. Twenty years ago, it was no big deal to hear communicators talk about publications they were producing “going two-up, four over four, with spot varnish, embossing, and full bleeds.” None of these communicators worked in print shops, but they knew the technology of the offset press because that knowledge helped them plan the most effective publication possible.

If the Internet is the printing press of the digital age—if the world truly is shifting away from tangible to digital media—communicators need to develop the same level of understanding of the tools or our ability to innovate will be severely limited and clients will look to non-communication alternatives who are able to innovate.

I’m not suggesting we need to be able to write code, program RUby on Rails, or manage a server any more than we were expected to create negatives or burn plates for print. But we need to grasp all the capabilities of the tools we’re using to communicate.

Am I wrong?

09/23/09 | 9 Comments | Social media is not a car

Comments
  • 1.Posterous stands to be an incredible tool for organizations that need to aggregate and publish in a snap.

    http://occamsrazr.com/2009/09/18/swine-flu-newsrooms-spreading-to-you/

    Ike | September 2009 | Birmingham, AL

  • 2.Shel, I really like your analogy. I think too many people are arguing these days that "RSS is dead" without properly considering what the phrase means at its core.

    RSS is really just taking off as a technology and it has an exciting future ahead. With almost every major news outlet offering an RSS feed, you can see that there is mainstream support for the technology.

    The problem that lies ahead for RSS will be with how the technology is adopted by the average consumer. RSS adoption is still incredibly low largely because I think most browser or desktop RSS reader are too daunting for the majority of non-tech savvy end users.

    With your knowledge of what the underlying technology can do, what type of projects would you like to see emerge to help end users easily get the news they want delivered to them?

    John Robinson | September 2009 | Toronto, ON

  • 3.> Am I wrong?

    Rarely! And I wouldn't know that without my RSS reader alerting me and linking to your posts!

    Mac | September 2009

  • 4.I agree Shel, you need to know your USP's. And that also applies to the car trade: Try to sell a Tesla without knowing anything about its capabilities, i.e. USP's, to a dedicated Corvette driver for example.

    Achim Muellers | September 2009 | Munich/Germany

  • 5.The age of the geek communicator is upon us. Technology has no intention of slowing down, and many people are already having a hard time keeping up. It's obvious now that up and coming communicators, marketers and PR pros are going to have to not only embrace technology but understand it thoroughly. Like Achim Muellers said, it's hard to sell something you don't understand. And when you need executive buy-in to get start your project, you'd better be able to sell the technology it depends on.

    Dagan Henderson | September 2009 | Walnut Grove, CA

  • 6.I think you're right. For sure.

    I'm still trying to wrap my brain around the RSS cloud thing though.

    And I'm not sure how it benefits my clients to put them on poster.us when I could build that same functionality into their existing blog. Same goes for my own content.

    I know how to easily post content to my blog and twitter and facebook. Why do sophisticated people need poster.us?

    -M

    Wolfy | September 2009 | Reno, Nevada

  • 7.Wolfy -

    ...because not everyone is sophisticated.

    Read my post. It is a great engine for health departments, non-profits, and other agencies where the person tasked with communications is *not* trained in traditional communication arts. Many PIOs rise through the ranks, and "communicator" is the third hat they wear.

    Also, for projects like H1N1 or specific disasters, there's not time to spend getting people over the learning curve - they need results *now*.

    The other beauty of Posterous is it ties accounts together - dump the data in one place, and let it percolate to the places where individuals are most comfortable consuming.

    Would you really enjoy the drudgework of cutting and pasting, entering the same information into every account?

    Ike | September 2009 | Birmingham, AL

  • 8.I don't enjoy that at all.

    Ping.fm does that for me without creating a new un-branded content platform.

    But that does take some sophistication...

    -M

    Wolfy | September 2009 | Reno, Nevada

  • 9.I'm not sure if knowing all of the capabilities of the tools we are using is as important as how the people we are communicating with use those capabilities. While I agree that RSS is an awesome technology, those I frequently communicate with do not utilize news readers...but without RSS I couldn't utilize a service like Ping.fm to get my messages out to countless social networks. I generally feel like the majority of people are still slow to adopt (see: text messaging just now catching on). And by the time they do adopt, the platform may be useless to them (see: Twitter). My two centavos ;-)

    Matt | September 2009 | Summit, NJ

Comment Form

« Back