△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

Let’s hear it for audio

There’s a meme building strength that suggests video podcasting will dominate audio-only. I don’t buy it. First of all, as I’ve noted so often in the past, audio is unique among communication channels because you can pay attention to it while you’re doing something else. I got through about eight podcasts yesterday while driving from one errand to another. I wouldn’t have been able to do that with video podcasts (or, if I’d tried, I’d probably be dealing with insurance paperwork right about now).

Now there’s research to support the notion that people will listen to more of an online audio file than they will watch an online video. The research comes from Podzinger, the online audio-and-video search engine. (Note: Neville and I just finished recording an interview with Podzinger President Alex Laats, which will be available shortly on the For Immediate Release blog.) According to the study, consumers typically will listen to audio for almost three times longer then they will watch a video.

There was other interesting data in the study, which was undertaken to provide some evidence to prospective advertisers that online audio and video was a good investment. For example, consumers tolerate ads that appear during searches for audio and video content; they’re also willing to watch 10-15-second ads that precede a video as a de facto element of such content. Also, consumers are more likely to play content online than they are to download it (by a factor of nearly six to one).

In any case, the value of audio podcasts won’t fade in the face of the rising popularity of video podcasts.

12/19/06 | 6 Comments | Let’s hear it for audio

Comments
  • 1.I agree with that completely, online video challenges podcasts only as much as TV challenges radio. The key to audio is getting time back in the car listening to what you want rather than the garbage on the radio. Granted, online video will challenge TV so there will be more money up there, but there's plenty of money to talk away from radio.

    John Wall | December 2006 | Straight outta Boston

  • 2.Good points, Shel. I like video when I really need to SEE what's going on -- a demonstration of some sort. I am not interested in talking heads. I LOVE the fact that I can listen to audio podcasts while exercising, walking, cleaning, driving, etc. Video would not work in those contexts.

    Speaking about the value of audio vs. video... When I studied the art of voiceover, our instructor, who worked in TV and radio, told us that people would LISTEN to a TV show when the picture went out, but they would quickly abandon a show that had lost its sound. What does THIS tell you???

    donna papacosta | December 2006 | Toronto

  • 3.Nice post, Shel, and I definitely agree. The key value of audio is that you *can* multi-task. Our listener survey found that we had a good number of folks who listened while driving to work - or walking the dog. Neither of those situations will work very well with video! Likewise it is darn hard to ride a bicycle while watching a video... on the other hand, it was a way that I enjoyed listening to a lot of podcasts this summer.

    Interesting point, Donna, about audience behavior with TV shows. I could definitely see that.

    Dan York | December 2006

  • 4.Generally, I agree - audio ain't goin' anywhere. But it's tough to say which one is "better." It all depends on what the communicator is trying to accomplish and how the audience will best receive the communication.

    FIR, for example - perfect for the audio format. Ask a Ninja, on the other hand, would lack a good chunk of its appeal if weren't for the ridiculous video.

    Mike Keliher | December 2006 | St. Paul, MN

  • 5.As an old radio guy I say bravo!

    And I'll echo John's statement about the automobile-- podcasting on the go (portable media), especially for commuting, will always be an audio-dominated domain.

    The difference between the 2 truly is analogous to the difference between TV and radio.

    Doug Haslam | December 2006 | Woburn, MA

  • 6.I work in a radio and I guess that radio will live forever.

    portable toilet ma | January 2008 | rusia

Comment Form

« Back