△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

Bold predictions on just plain hubris?

imageFuat Kircaali, the founder and CEO of

Sys-Con Media, has been outlandish in his predictions for the success of his latest venture, a self-publishing site called Ulitzer. (That’s “Pulitzer” without the “P.” Get it?)

How great does Kircaali think the prospects are for the site? “Within the next five years, Time Magazine, the Harvard Business Review, Scientific American, Conde Nast Traveler, and Wikipedia will be replaced by Ulitzer.”

The toppling of Wikipedia is inevitable, Kircaali maintains, just as Facebook overtook MySpace’s lead. In fact, in another post Kircaali claims Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn will all be proven useless before the end of this year; Kircaali believes they’ll never “pass the stage of mass spam tools.” More on that other post in a bit.

If ever I wished I were a bookie…

The site has so far attracted about 7,000 authors and about a million articles, far short of Wikipedia, but then again it has only been around since it launched in beta on March 29. Still, according to Alexa, Ulitzer has attracted a whopping .0025% of the global Internet population, with only a 470% growth curve since the site launched.

Shel Holtz

Once you’re approved as an author, you can launch a magazine, a subject-based portal, or a new topic category, then populate these with any of those million articles in the Ulitzer database. You can also import your own blog feed to add your posts to the mix. You earn money through Google ads and there are editors for each Ulitzer site providing some kind of editorial control.

From a PR perspective, there’s also a “News Desk” where you can post press releases and other content on behalf of your company or client. This content then gets distributed into revelant topics. Presumably, this works as Google juice, since the item will appear in multiple places on Ulitzer. As you’ll see in a minute, Kircaali believes the only PR agencies that will survive are those that will publish client content this way.

The launch hasn’t been without controversy. Kircaali felt compelled to write a post defending Ulitzer against claims that articles had to be removed for copyright violation (Kircaali asserts none were) and that only four authors have asked to have their profile pages turned off (there were allegations, apparently, that a lot of authors wanted to back out but couldn’t).

Kircaali’s more recent post offers the provocative headline, “Is the PR business extinct? Yes.

The post is as preposterous as a lot of Kircaali’s other assertions. For example, he suggests that 70% of today’s PR agencies won’t survive the “fast approaching media avalanche” because 90% of today’s PR firms are still in business because the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not allow companies to communicate material information on websites.

I’d pay real money to know where Kircaali gets his statistic. I could have sworn all those agencies were out there helping organizations build and maintain positive relationships with constituent publics. How silly of me.

Further, Kircaali says there are only three kinds of agencies. Those using Ulitzer every day as a channel for their clients’ news, those who are using Ulitzer to publish bylined articles and tapping into its syndication features (these are the agencies, of course, that will survive), and those who are “horrified by the idea that their clients may actually find out about (Ulitzer).” Those must be the doomed 70%.

But wait. There’s more. Kircaali asserts—in bold face, no less—that “the companies with the largest number of professional bloggers will win:”

Tomorrow’s (and I mean tomorrow, not the next decade) marketing game will be played onprofessional corporate blogging platforms. The companies with the largest number of well-read and respected corporate bloggers will win the marketing and propaganda games. Larger companies will need larger armies of corporate bloggers. the new job description of “professional corporate blogger” will be a very popular one.

To be or not to be, that is the question for the PR firms that will hit the wall at this stage. The ones who are equipped to provide those services whose job description are not yet defined will be tomorrow’s brave new PR companies.

Kircaali doesn’t see actual employees doing real work who engage their communities through social media channels including blogs. No, he sees companies hiring people who will just blog.

I have to admit the Ulitzer model looks interesting (with a design that looks dangerously similar to ZD’s online prescence), although nowhere does it provide encyclopedic listings, leading me to wonder how Kircaali envisions Ulitzer driving Wikipedia to an early digital grave. As for Kircaali, I’ll be monitoring him closely, waiting for more brash and unsuportable predictions to lighten up my day.

05/28/09 | 5 Comments | Bold predictions on just plain hubris?

Comments
  • 1.Thanks for this, Shel. When I initially saw Kircaali's post, I saw it as a blatant grandstanding to promote a product; something somebody who knew nothing about PR would do, and something good PR pros would beg their clients not to do.

    I initially missed that he was also the founder of Sys-Con, so he can publish whatever he likes.

    Still, bad taste in mouth, though you fairly illuminated the interesting bits of the Ulitzer service.

    Doug Haslam | May 2009 | Boston

  • 2.At first glance I agree with much of what you say, but it's also kind of interesting. The craziest thing, though, it seems that their global header links for About, Contact and Advertise don't work. Interesting.

    His claims seem over the top, regardless of whether the site is of any interest. But I'm going to check it out and follow along for a while.

    I completely disagree with him about the claims he's making on the PR profession in general. Many PR firms are still slow to adapt to change with the proliferation of social media tools, etc., but they will eventually adapt, as PR in general will adapt to meet the landscape of a more connecting universe.

    Christine Fife | May 2009 | San Francisco, CA, USA

  • 3.Why am I reminded of Ray McKigney? For those of you who have lives, he was a legendary hand model in the Seinfeld universe, whose career fell apart because... "no woman could match the beauty of his own hand."

    Thank god you made clear what Ulitzer referred to, 'cause I totally missed it. Thanks for the laugh.

    Bob LeDrew | May 2009 | Ottawa, ON

  • 4.Shel, why are we giving this arrogant, self important person so much power? I ventured on the site, because your review intrigued me, and I don't see why anyone would even consider joining. Probably because the authors joining this "network" are not skilled enough to create their own brands and to promote these brands on their own? Then it makes sense, but why Ulitzer? Why not Associated Content - at least this pays for content. Why not Helium, or why not creating some Squidoo lenses? As much as Kircaali is blowing his own horn, I still don't understand what would make Ulitzer a Wikipedia contender. They are not even functioning on the same principle, for God's sake!

    Oh yes, and if you were wondering why there are so many articles already at Ulitzer, that's because they duplicate content that was previously posted on sys-con.com

    Mihaela Lica | June 2009 | Germany

  • 5.I admit the post by Mr. Kircaali got my blood boiling. Being in PR, it had the same effect of him calling my baby ugly. I believe his error comes in his narrow definition of what PR is. It is more than just news releases, it is strategic thinking at its very best. Companies engaged in social media know that a strong PR strategy is needed to achieve effective online communication. I share more on my viewpoint here http://bit.ly/akoJr

    @marciecasas
    http://www.gdc-co.com/blog

    Marcie Casas | June 2009 | San Antonio, TX

Comment Form

« Back