△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

Death Watch Case File #1: Tangible Media

In a post on November 17, I created the Death Watch list, a rundown of various media whose death has been widely predicted. This is the first in a series of posts that takes a deeper dive into these.

Shel HoltzA utopian vision has emerged in which every expression of human endeavor once conveyed via physical media is transformed into digital media. Micro Persuasion blogger Steve Rubel, a vice president at Edelman, has bet that “by January 2014…in the US almost all forms of tangible media will either be in sharp decline or completely extinct.” Steve lists print—books, magazines and newspapers—but also DVDs, boxed software, and video games.

The examples Steve lists to support his argument are mostly good ones. But they are not signs of a tangible media apocalypse. Rather, they are examples of what happens when new technologies produce more advantages than the existing technologies. In almost every instance, the old media adapt, abdicating much of what they used to do to the new kid on the block, but carving out a niche based on their remaining strengths.

I’m dismissing the DVD/CD/software category from the mix, as these are solely about distribution methods. When you buy software in the box, it’s so you can install it on your computer. The fact that you downloaded it instead of buying the box doesn’t mean you wind up with a different approach to the application on your hard drive, it’s exactly the same. That’s not the same as an ebook, which on a Kindle doesn’t look or function anything like a paper book with its 80-pound book stock.

Books

Let’s start with books. Steve notes that Oprah Winfrey’s endorsement of the Amazon Kindle as the next big thing sparked a surge in demand for the electronic book hardware. (Of course, if Oprah waxed enthusiastic about a new brand of paper towels, they’d fly off the shelves.) I have a Kindle, and I do like it a lot, some usability issues aside. But I use it primarily when I’m traveling so I don’t need to figure out how to carry a 900-page book without exceeding the airlines’ carry-on limit. At home, I still prefer to hold a real book in my hand. It’s easier on the eyes, it never loses its charge, and I never accidentally turn a page.

But there’s more to printed books. I can make notes in the margin. I can put it on a shelf and refer to it (and my margin notes) later. If the book has graphics, they are sharp and clear. Artwork—such as Gilbert Stuart’s oil painting of John Adams appearing in a biography of America’s second president—are reproduced with brilliant four-color process printing that simply cannot be duplicated with the limited palette of colors built into web browser technology.

In fact, coffee table books featuring photography and artwork still display the images with far better fidelity than you can get on the Web.

So at least these forms of books will survive because they are better at what they do than their digital counterparts. But print is also finding new life as a channel for creative expression through print-on-demand (POD) services like Blurb and Lulu. Blurb continues to grow despite current economic conditions that are hastening the demise of some other print-based enterprises. According to a friend who works there, POD’s popularity is largely attributable to the ease with which people can channel their creativity into print without incurring the costs that once kept it off limits.

“Look through the Blurb bookstore for 10 minutes,” he told me. “You’ll see what I mean.” In addition to the expected collections of photos from weddings and Bar Mitzvahs and the like, there’s a book of photos of people in their underwear in their bedrooms titled “The Underwear Experiment,” Piers Fawke‘s book of nine good ideas and various implementations of them, and a book of paintings by an artist who says, “My books are currently a way of publishing to my friends the stuff they have never seen and paintings they can’t afford.”

While some print companies suffer, my friend told me tens of thousands of books were published by Blurb last week alone, and the number continues to grow. This is a classic case of an old medium adapting by transforming into something people want that cannot be duplicated using the newer technology.

Magazines

In his post, Steve doesn’t offer any particular evidence to support the demise of magazines. I suspect he figures they’re just caught up in the general collapse of tangible media; he also notes that he hasn’t bought one in a couple years. (I share Steve’s passion for digital content, but still like to pick up a magazine at airport newsstand to read on the flight—I’m allowed to have it open during takeoff and landing, which isn’t true of my digital devices.) Magazine publishing has always been a dicey business, but the circulations of popular magazines continue to grow. Despite the move to all things digital, titles like Vanity Fair, Esquire, In Style, and Ladies’ Home Journal continue to gain subscriptions. The secret here is knowing your audience, producing compelling content, and creating a total package between the front and back covers that offers a self-contained experience you just can’t get on the Web.

Other tangible media

Steve doesn’t list a lot of other tangible media on his post, but he is explicit in his view that all tangible media will be gone or on their way out by 2014. I wonder if this would include…

  • Artwork for your walls—Digital picture frames are nice, but I’d rather have a Peter Max on my wall than a digital image of one
  • Billboards—Some are going digital, but these are wildly expensive and outdoor advertising is still mainly a print business
  • Direct mail—Maybe we wish it would go away, but I don’t see any signs that it is. In fact, people I know in the DM industry suggest it thrives because it works. And, to be honest, I would never remember to order my company holiday cards if the packages from four or five different suppliers didn’t show up in my mail every August or so.
  • Table tent cards and other collateral—Based on what I’m looking at in my hotel room, and what I see in other hotel rooms, restaurants, and other venues—this is another form of tangible media that doesn’t seem to be suffering.
  • Brochures—Here in Las Vegas, where I’m visiting for the Thanksgiving holiday, they’re stuffed into pockets of cabs and available in hotels by the thousands. After riding one of the thrill rides atop the Stratosphere Hotel, I grabbed a brochure that detailed the tower’s height and other characteristics. Do you see these going away any time soon?

This is a short list; I’m sure you could add to it.

But the point should be clear. The notion that tangible media will be gone by 2014—or even 2054—is ridiculous.

(I don’t mean to take aim at Steve Rubel, by the way—he’s hardly alone in this digital fanboy perspective that can’t imagine how anything that isn’t digital could possibly have a place in the world. Besides, if Steve were the only one promoting this nonsense, I wouldn’t include it on my DeathWatch list, which is made up of items popularly believed to be on their way out. Steve’s post is just the most recent item I could find that articulates this point of view.)

As I noted early in this post, old media adapt, embracing the uses at which they are better than the new media and leaving everything else to the newer technologies.

11/26/08 | 10 Comments | Death Watch Case File #1: Tangible Media

Comments
  • 1.Social marketing expert Shel Holz begins a Death Watch series on various media whose death has been widely predicted. He kicks off the series today with a look at the coming decline in tangible media ??? books, magazines and newspapers ??? as media continue to flow into digital containers. Let's take these one at a time. Books: While my friend Steve Rubel predicts that all these media will be extinct or in sharp decline by 2013, I'm with Shel on this one. In my view, books will continue,…

  • 2.The so-called demise of tangible media reminds me of the "paperless office" hysteria a few years back when PCs became ubiquitous. Sounded good at the time and I wish it were true, but our use of paper has increased, not decreased.

    Ultimately, it comes down to meeting the individual preferences of consumers and businesses. Although I personally prefer digital media from an environmental perspective, nothing can replace the sweet satisfaction of cracking the spine on a much-anticipated hardcover.

    Harp Arora | November 2008 | Waterloo Canada

  • 3.Talk to someone who remembers traveling by train in the early 20th century and they will most likely wax poetically about the pleasure of it all. At some point the train became inefficient as the primary form of travel.

    How many train companies "adapted" (as Shel puts it) by moving from trains to automobiles or plains? To my knowledge not a one. I would have meant speeding up the death of their highly profitable businesses and investing in the future something the vast majority of established businesses are not willing to do.

    Only one thing matter profits and viability and neither has to do with our level satisfaction or pleasure.

    Jose Leal | November 2008 | Toronot, Ontario, Canada

  • 4.Jose, I've read your comment three times and haven't figured out the connection between advances in transportation and the adaptability of media. Of course, trains were still running, the last time I checked, with Amtrak serving as a viable transportation method, although certainly no longer the primary one. (I would suggest that horses were used more the trains in the mid-late 19th century anyway.) I take BART to San Francisco more frequently than I drive, and news reports indicate that people who changed their habits and began using BART when gasoline prices were high have not gone back to their cars now that fuel prices have dropped again.

    In any case, my post was about media, not transportation, and I can still listen to the radio despite the introduction of television.

    Do you suspect the Louvre will replace all those original paintings with digital frames displaying dithered renditions of the originals?

    In fact, when it comes to magazines, books, brochures, and marketing collateral like table tent cards, is there anything in my post you dispute? Just curious...

    Shel Holtz | November 2008

  • 5.Shel, I obviously didn?t make my views very clear. My point was about the adaptability of big corporations and not that of the trains themselves.

    By the way, AMTRAK only exists today thanks to the federal government stepping in to save national passenger train service back in the early 70's. The same thing happened in Canada with VIA Rail around the same time. To my knowledge there are no private passenger rail companies left in North America. That was my point, the train companies did not adapt and therefore died off one by one.

    Yes, your post is about media, but media, the traditional type at least, does not exist without profitable organizations behind them. I worked for a division of Quebecor Inc. the holding company of Quebecor World, the second largest printer in the world. They print about a billion books each year, not to mention the billions of flyers, magazines and so forth. They?re now in chapter 11, in part because of the reduced demand for printed products of all types.

    There will always be printed books, I agree. But, will the printed book be the primary way people publish written materials? My answer is an emphatic NO! It will not make economic sense and in our world that's more import than anything else.

    Back in 1995 I founded Autonet.ca, Canada?s first automotive portal. Before that time, the only way you could get specs on a car was by picking-up a brochure at a dealership (btw?most were printed by Quebecor). Today, there are many more car specs and other car information online. All the car manufactures are spending a lot more money on the web versions of their brochures than the printed versions. Many dealers are either handing out printouts or referring people to the websites, rather than handing out the very expensive glossy brochures.

    We can dispute the future all day long and most likely we will all be wrong. What we do know is what has happened (history of the train companies is one example) and what is happening and none of it bodes well for those who own or are employed by the media industries.

    Jose Leal | November 2008 | Toronot, Ontario, Canada

  • 6.On the other hand, Jose, Blurb.com is a new corporation founded on a new model doing gangbuster business. The future of print is strong, but not based on old applications. Rather, this company (and Lulu and others) have found new uses for print that people want, rather than attempting to force a continued use of print for purposes people no longer need. This is what I mean by adaptability, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with protectionism by companies with outmoded models.

    I also never suggested that print would remain the dominant form of publishing, just as radio did not remain the dominant form of entertainment after the debut of television. But it doesn't need to be dominant in order to be viable and strong.

    Shel Holtz | November 2008

  • 7.I'm not sure why it is that people take an all or nothing approach to these types of issues--in my opinion, things have a way of adapting to different conditions. Electric lights didn't do in the candle industry after all.

    I love books, and can't imagine giving them up completely; there will be a demand. As far as magazines are concerned, Steve seems to have forgotten a rather sizable portion of the population--women--purchase magazines in large part for the photos. For me, cooking magazines fit this bill--a glossy, full-page photo of a dish...seriously, I can spend hours flipping through them. And yes, I can find recipes online, but I'm also much more apt to lose them that way too.

    Like many other industries, the publishing industry will adapt, not disappear.

    Jen

    Jen Zingsheim | December 2008

  • 8.With new technologies nowadays, I think the notion that almost all forms of tangible media will decline, is possible but I think it will not be completely extinct. ebooks are nice and can easily be accessed especially if I'm traveling...but I still prefer having a real book with me. I love lying on my bed while reading a book; and I can't do this with ebook. So, I agree with you that this notion is ridiculous.

    Cian Warenwirtschaft | December 2008

  • 9.I'm with you on this Shel. And like Jen, like to curl up with a paperback or lazily finger a magazine over coffee. Also - my bookshelf is a catalogue of memories that go beyond the stories; the books remind me of where and when I read them. My ebooks don't give me that.

    Tony Eyles | December 2008 | Wellington, NZ

  • 10.Printed media is surely the first candidate for media extinction. Though most books are produced digitally, many digital versions are not widely available to the public, also there is no decline on the rate of book publishing. Beside for many readers flipping pages is more comfortable than pushing buttons in an ebook reader.

    Igor Musta | August 2009

Comment Form

« Back