△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

My Ragan video interview on the GlennTilton.com website

Mark Ragan interviewed me last week while I was at the Ragan/eBay social media conference about the Glenn Tilton website. Tilton is the CEO of United Airlines, but the blog—and the domain—belong to the pilot’s union, which is calling for the CEO’s resigation or firing.

The video is featured on Ragan’s home page, but I’ll save you the trip (although Ragan.com pretty much always has content worth reading):

In the interview, I reiterate the importance of companies grabbing domains (and Twitter accounts and FriendFeed rooms) for their most basic names and trademarks. You can’t get them all, but United certainly should have considered the consequences of somebody else getting their hands on GlennTilton.com.

Richard Millington, over on his FeverBee blog, has taken issue with this notion, and to prove his point, he registered the Twitter account NelsonMandela, noting:

You can’t protect your brand name online. If NelsonMandela was registered then I could’ve picked NMandela, Mandela, NelsonM, Nelsieboy etc…If those were all taken on Twitter, I could’ve used Plurk or Jaiku. I could’ve registered NelsonMandela.typepad.com or on wordpress or blogger. I could’ve posted comments as him on any number of political forums.

I would argue that you can have the other names since they’re not the obvious official names that could easily be confused with the real person, company, brand or trademark. But Mandela (or his people) should have registered the NelsonMandela account, on Twitter as well as other social media properties. It’s also incumbent upon business communicators to be aware of new social media channels and grab the names there as quickly as possible.

Millington’s right when he says he could do little to sabotage Mandela’s reputation with fake announcements on Twitter, but why run the risk? And while the United pilots aren’t pretending to speak in Tilton’s name, not only are people visiting the site thinking they’ll find Tilton there only to encounter his most vocal opposition, it has generated scads of unwanted publicity that never would have happened if they had been relegated to registering something like TiltonS.com (on which, let’s face it, the union wouldn’t have wasted its time).

Comments
  • 1.I think on the whole you're right: you shouldn't go overboard registering permutations of names. But registering the main and obvious name is probably a good preventative measure.

    I wrote about this, but took a different approach, looking at what United's options were now that the damage has been done. I hope you find it useful:

    http://www.truthypr.com/2008/08/united-airlines.html

    Shabbir | August 2008 | San Francisco

  • 2.Thanks, Shabbir. I'm on the record these days as dismissing the "we won't dignify this with an answer" response. Tilton's brand is being defined for him. He doesn't have to address directly the charges on the pilot site, but he certainly should get his own voice out there, defining the issues and solutions as he sees them.

    Shel Holtz | August 2008 | Concord, CA

  • 3.Why companies don't grab accounts on twitter or FriendFeed in their names, I'll never understand. It takes a couple of minutes at most.

    But much worse to me is when social media or web firms don't do it on behalf of their clients. I know a few web developers quite well, and I know which companies they do a lot of work for. I often will email or dm the developers to suggest they open accounts in their clients' names on various sites "just in case."

    They never do it.

    Dominic Jones | August 2008

Comment Form

« Back