△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

Go away. I know everything.

UPDATE:: Jenny Dervin has clarified her comments in a post to the PRWeek blog; thanks to Rob Clark for pointing out in a comment to this post. The salient paragraph: “???Every industry has an ambulance chaser segment, and in crisis situations, this is the group that smells blood and goes in for the kill. I was addressing my comments to those people, who probably don???t even read PRWeek, because they are only interested in the next big company to list on their website.???  I wonder if any of those who contacted JetBlue had genuinely good advice and didn’t fit into this category.


I’ve been mostly complimentary about JetBlue’s handling of its crisis (here and here). From a crisis communication standpoint, the company has done most things right. There are things the company could have handled better and some actions it missed altogether. I’m hardly alone in noting the missed opportunities and suggesting ways to improve the airlines’ communication to passengers and prospective passengers. Communication and marketing bloggers have been all over this story, running the gamut from Seth Godin to Shel Israel, from BusinessWeek to Crisisblogger Gerald Baron.

I don’t think anybody at JetBlue is listening, though, so don’t expect any of these suggestions to find their way into the airlines’ mix of strategies. They don’t want to hear it.

In fact, according to an article in this week’s issue of PRWeek, anybody who contacted the airline with suggestions is now persona non grata.

Jenny Dervin, director of communications at JetBlue, is quoted tossing off this gem:

JetBlue corporate communications does not have a PR AOR, nor do we ever intend on getting one. Those agencies that felt the need to contact our CEO and the corporate communications department directly, telling us exactly what we were doing wrong, were not helpful, and they are all going to go on a special list that I’m going to share with my colleagues in the PR industry, encouraging them never to do business with those companies.

Let me get this straight. A communications professional watching the crisis effort unfold sees a gaping hole in the plan (e.g., the CEO’s pseudo blog has not been updated since February 1 and allows no comments) and has the nerve, the temerity, the balls to pick up the phone and offer up a suggestion. For his trouble, he gets put on Jenny Dervin’s blacklist. It must be that Jenny and her team of seven full-time communicators have all the answers and don’t need any advice from anybody else. That must be why…

  • When the blog was finally updated, it was with a verbatim copy of the email that JetBlue had distributed
  • The email, addressed to passengers, went to people who had never flown JetBlue, and in some cases was sent multiple times to the same email address
  • No commenting was opened up on CEO Dave Neeleman’s blog despite the fact that allowing passengers to vent, to get their frustrations off their chests, might have been the smartest communication tactic JetBlue could have employed
  • It was never suggested that passengers stuck on planes that icy February day be given free flights for a year, or 40 free flights (Godin’s suggestion), or some other remarkable compensation that would have turned the conversation completely around
  • Neeleman’s “Late Show with David Letterman” appearance featured an uncomfortable Neeleman dodging Letterman’s questions, clearly based on a briefing he’d had with a communiations staffer who told him, “Whatever you’re asked, here’s what you say…” (It’s immortalized on YouTube, of course…here are part 1 and part 2.)
  • The JetBlue Hostage blog is alive and well

It must be nice to know everything so you don’t have to welcome any recommendations from well-meaning professionals who may actually know what they’re talking about. Or maybe there’s some other channel Ms. Dervin would prefer people take. Carrier pigeon, perhaps? In any case, my esteem for JetBlue has plummeted after reading Ms. Dervin’s arrogant tirade. If there’s anybody I wouldn’t want to work with, it’s someone who thinks she has nothing to learn. That puts her at the top of my new list.

02/28/07 | 7 Comments | Go away. I know everything.

Comments
  • 1.Shel, that is just astonishing what Ms. Dervin said. I have a hunch that any communicator or PR person worth his or her salt will stay away from working for JetBlue for a while. (Kinda like many passengers.) This kind of attitude seems antithetical to what JetBlue seems to want to be...but maybe not. I do have some advice for Mr. Neeleman, and it might involve some staff changes.

    Frank Roche | February 2007 | Philadelphia, PA, USA

  • 2.Hi Shel,
    Jenny's posted a comment on the PRWeek blog clarifying her comments "Every industry has an ambulance chaser segment, and in crisis situations, this is the group that smells blood and goes in for the kill. I was addressing my comments to those people, who probably don?t even read PRWeek, because they are only interested in the next big company to list on their website."

    http://thecycle.prweekblogs.com/2007/02/23/are-you-on-the-list/

    Rob Clark | February 2007 | Mississauga, ON

  • 3.Wow...nice clarification...it's a little telling though that it was needed at all. I can understand the frustration, but I have to believe that people offered genuine help too. There is no limit to good ideas, even if some seem off-the-wall.

    Frank Roche | February 2007 | Philadelphia, PA, USA

  • 4.This story continues to be one that seems to lack any element of common sense. Why is it that in exceptional situations (like a plane getting stuck on a runway, or luggage going astray, etc) the response so often is to treat this as something that requires a complicated response? Why is it that large companies can't just respond in a personal way? Why don't they just say "sorry?"

    If your business is normally to help people (get somewhere, do something, buy something) and you screw up, doesn't it make sense to just say, "Sorry. That's my fault. Here, take this." That's just common sense and good manners. Can anyone really think of a situation where putting the satisfaction of the customer/end user/client is not the most important thing?

    The actions of JetBlue's corporate reps are just silly. If they had owned up, said they were sorry and offered some meaningful compensation, they would not have a "situation" -- they'd have an answer.

    Dave Traynor | March 2007 | Victoria, BC

  • 5.Dave, "Sorry" is the one thing they did well! They've been humble and apologetic to a fault. Meaningful compensation is another thing. Apologies are rare, and JetBlue deserves credit for making one (repeatedly).

    Shel Holtz | March 2007 | Concord, CA

  • 6.Even with her clarification, I'm guessing that the next time Jenny finds herself in a crisis, the ONLY calls she's going to get will be from the ambulance chasers.

    The people with real advice to offer won't bother for fear of how she will perceive their advances. So the only free advice Jenny is getting will be bad advice.

    And the cost of good advice has just gone up... :-)

    Dominic Jones | March 2007 | Toronto

  • 7.I'm an editorial cartoonist based in New Jersey, and here's a cartoon a did on the JetBlue fiasco. I hope you enjoy it:
    Click here for cartoon.

    Rob Tornoe | March 2007 | New Jersey

Comment Form

« Back