△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

AIG’s executives: A confederacy of dunces

I have come to the sad conclusion that the people running AIG are idiots. Dolts. Complete and irredeemable morons.

I defended the Southern California retreat for which AIG took so much heat. That event was an incentive for top-performing life insurance salespeople. It was part of the compensation for their contributions and necessary to keep the company’s top performers from defecting to the competition. If anything is going to help AIG get out of its hole and repay the taxpayer bailout it received, it will be top performers selling their asses off. Instead of criticizing the event, I suggested AIG should have foreseen how the retreat would be perceived and been proactive in communicating what the event was, who it was for, and why it was an investment in future sales.

Shel HoltzToday, it has been revealed that AIG held another event at a posh Arizona resort. The rationale for the event makes perfect sense. AIG’s CEO Edward Liddy explained the rationale after the event was exposed by local TV news reporter Josh Bernstein. Exposed because AIG made every effort to keep the event a secret.

Brilliant planning there, Fast Eddie. Like nobody’s paying careful attention to every minuscule move your company makes. (News flash, Ed: You’re under the world’s biggest freaking microscope.)

I can just imagine the conversation among the reality-challenged executives who made this monumentally stupid decision:

Executive #1: We need to train the independent, non-employee financial planners who recommend our products to their clients. The more knowledgable these planners are about our products, the more inclined they’ll be to recommend them, and to the right clients. We rely on these guys for sales; the training is a necessary investment in those sales.

Executive #2: Well, yeah, all the companies in our line of business do this as a matter of routine. But we have a problem most of our competitors don’t have. The public couldn’t possibly understand this and, because of that bailout thing, if they see us sponsoring an event like this, they’ll crucify us.

Executive #3: Why don’t we just host the event at some Ramada Inn in East Bumcrap, and instead of sending our top execs for the planners to meet, we’ll send mid-level sales support staff?

Executive #2: Are you nuts? What financial planner would invest his own money and time to come to a meeting in a Ramada Inn in East Bumcrap? We’ll end up with three has-been B-list football players who got mail-order degrees in financial planning. We need to train 150 of the best, most sought-after financial planners in the country if we’re going to produce the kind of sales we need.

Executive #1: He’s right, you know. These guys are high-powered players. They only turn out for top-drawer events. And they expect to hobnob with the top brass.

Executive #3: Hey, I have an idea. We’ll do it in secret. We’ll make sure the hotel staff is in on it, we’ll come up with a fake company name and a fake logo. It’ll be cool, just like an undercover operation. I’ll be Jack Bauer. You can be James Bond.

Executive #1: I love this plan. But I wanna be Jack Bauer.

After his company was caught—hidden camera and all—Liddy went public and made a number of points:

  • Most of the tab was picked up by sponsors and participants (the company even released a list of the partners who covered the costs)
  • The company has canceled some 160 planned events; the ones kept on the company’s calendars were deemed mission-critical (like training independent planners to sell your products so you can make a ton of money and repay your debt)
  • The fancy hotel rooms in which AIG execs stayed were comped by the hotel as part of the total $360,000 package (90% of which, remember, was paid for by partners and participants)

Anybody who has spent time in business recognizes these as legitimate points. But it’s hard to convince anybody you’re telling the truth after you’ve been caught in a cover-up. Footage shown by the Phoenix ABC-TV affiliate included the KNXV reporter confronting a couple AIG execs as they hurried, tight-lipped, onto their flight.

After a performance like that—along with other damning footage on top of the revelation that AIG tried to pull this off covertly—few are inclined to believe a word Liddy says. His quote—“We appreciate what the taxpayer and the federal government has done for us…We intend to pay back every penny we’ve borrowed”—rings especially hollow after being caught in a premeditated, willful effort to deceive. Sure, Liddy did the right thing by appearing on CNN’s Larry King to personally address the charges, and a press release was issued defending the event. But it was way too little, way, way too late.

So now AIG has federal legislators calling for Liddy’s head on a platter and taxpayers itching to form a lynch mob, pitchforks and torches at the ready. All of which could have been avoided if AIG had just been transparent. Rather than assume the public is too stupid to understand its business, AIG should have explained up front the realities of the financial services market, how companies like AIG rely on independent agents to sell their products, how training these agents is what generates sales, and how these sessions need to be upscale or the agents won’t come and your product won’t sell. Maybe a lot of people wouldn’t have liked it, but AIG would be in a lot less trouble than they are now.

If this is the kind of leadership Liddy has to offer, maybe he should resign. But unless AIG’s top PR counselor (I have to assume this is Communications Senior Vice President Nicholas J. Ashooh) advised against this fiasco and was overruled, he definitely needs to go. (Besides, any PR counselor with an ounce of ethics would have resigned before engaging in such an ill-advised cover-up.)

AIG’s predicament should serve as an object lesson for executives at other companies who may still believe that opacity is a viable business strategy in today’s environment.

Comments
  • 1.You make very valid points, Shel, about transparency, and your imagined conversation between AIG execs is probably closer to the truth. When I worked for the railroad in the early 1980s, there were still some operating people who thought you could withhold information from the media about derailed and exploded and burning tank cars because "it's on my property, it's none of their damned business!"

    But these people continue to be clueless about their obligations to the taxpayers who are trying to keep them afloat. They should have cancelled ALL of these events for now. Training should be done on the shoestring you describe. They don't live in the Gilded Age anymore, they are OWNED by the taxpayers and the tradeoff for that safe harbor is not misusing the money.

    Even the ones who didn't get a bailout don't get the consequences. The New York Times on Sunday had a society page photo of Richard Fuld, the chairman of Lehman Brothers at the time of its collapse, in a tuxedo attending a fancy dinner at the New York Public Library as if nothing had happened. Meanwhile, thousands of former Lehman people who trusted their careers to the decisions he made are now wondering if they can afford groceries next month.

    There is clearly something wrong with the way these people think about themselves vs. the rest of the world. Good for you for pointing it out!

    Steven Lubetkin | November 2008 | Cherry Hill, NJ

  • 2.Shel, it looks horrible. And they KNEW it would look horrible. But you know what, there's nothing they can do but ride it out.

    AIG is not an auto manufacturer. They don't make widgets. They trade in information.

    The REAL dichotomy here is that the general public knows deep down these guys trade in information, and theoretically they don't need expensive trappings and travel.

    YET, the general public does NOT demand the same from its elected representatives in DC, who live in swankier digs, have more perks, and could telecommute saving us FAR more than the AIG independent agents could ever spend.

    AIG is going to be a victim, as long as those with bigger logs in their eyes keep them in the spotlight as a diversion.

    Ike | November 2008 | Birmingham

  • 3.All true, Ike; it's why I defended the Southern California sales incentive trip. But someone, somewhere knew that trying to hide the Phoenix session was a bad idea that would only make things much worse. Yep, they have to ride it out. Nope, they don't need to make dumb decisions in the process.

    Shel Holtz | November 2008

  • 4.Shel, interesting post, and I love the imagined conversation.

    Anyone who is sentient, based on high profile cases from Watergate on, should know that it's rarely the issue that gets you in trouble, it's the cover up.

    And yet, high profile people keep doing things with the intent to cover them up. Why? If you have a valid case (and I think they do here) make it, take your lumps from the people who think you are wrong, and move on. Key in this is tell the truth quickly.

    I'd have to agree that they are pretty thick if they thought they'd get away with this, and even dumber for trying to.

    Jen Zingsheim | November 2008

Comment Form

« Back