△ MENU/TOP △

Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz
Communicating at the Intersection of Business and Technology
SearchClose Icon

Official blogger vs. just plain folks

A lot of choices have to be made when a company decides to launch an official blog. Among these choices: Who will represent the company on the blog?

If you opt for a single blogger, you need to decide whether to tap someone already working for the company or hire a blogger. eBay opted for the latter, Real Networks for the former. Either way, that individual can potentially become a significant voice for the organization.

Some have argued the danger in this approach: If the blogger leaves the company to join, say, a competitor, the audience goes, too. While this may happen from time to time, I don’t buy it as an argument against an individual blogger. After all, key spokespeople have been changing jobs since long before the birth of the blogosphere. And if readers are as interested in the company as its blogger, they may just find themselves reading two blogs—the original blogger now talking about another company and the new blogger at the original company.

The other approach is a group blog. Some of the best corporate blogs are group blogs, including Direct2Dell, Southwest Airlines’ blog, GM’s Fastlane blog and TSA’s Evolution of Security. FastLane’s key blogger is GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz, but other key car executives—mostly people reporting to LUtz—also weigh in. At Southwest Airlines, a number of employees representing the spectrum of jobs at the company were vetted and trained to blog.

Some observers dislike group blogs because they dilute the single voice that can be so compelling on a one-person blog. However, a range of voices from throughout the organization can be equally appealing. There are other benefits to a group blog:

  • Nobody is required to spend too much time blogging. A post every couple weeks from each blogger assures a steady stream of fresh content.
  • When an issue arises, there is somebody already blogging who is likely to be able to address it based on his or her area of expertise.
  • If the blog is determined to be the best channel for a message from the president or CEO, the channel already exists even if the senior executive hasn’t made much use of it. GM’s Rick Wagoner has blogged on GM’s group blog; Gary Kelly at Southwest has done the same.

The most important advantage of a group blog, though, is that it reveals some of the real people in the organization to the public. The blogs listed above have demonstrated the good that comes from letting customer interact directly with employees. There’s also a financial advantage: Define an organization as you will, but without people, it’s nothing. The quality of an organization’s employees will have much to do with the company’s success or failure. Smart people communicating intelligently, candidly, and publicly about their jobs, the company, and the industry can only serve to inspire confidence in investors.

There’s no single right answer, of course; the choice between an individual and a group blog depends on what your company is trying to achieve with an official corporate blog. Weigh your options and choose what’s best for your company, but don’t automatically assume one approach is intrinsically better than the other.

07/02/08 | 3 Comments | Official blogger vs. just plain folks

Comments
  • 1.Hi Shel,
    You bring up a good point about what is best in deciding how to blog. But why does it just have to be one way? I think our strategy is to mainly have one blogger, but we will absolutely have guest posters too. Because, you're right, one person can't fully express what the company thinks and feels alone- but they can get a pretty good foundation going. As for me, well, I plan to be very involved in every facet of RN so I can cover as many bases as possible.

    Regardless, it's cool that companies are taking the initiative to let the consumers/and other businesses get to know what goes on behind those big closed doors. It doesn't have to be all big secrets. There's great stuff going on everywhere, and we are happy to tell you about it- whether it's just me, or 15 of us.

    Lacy

    Lacy Kemp | July 2008 | Seattle

  • 2.I would vote for group blogs. As you've pointed out, a single official blogger would always be under pressure to post something new and would soon probably turn into a full-time blogger. That might dilute the business perspective.

    The idea of an official blog is to open an informal channel of communication straight from the horses' mouth; the more horses, the merrier. Single-writer blogs are a good way to start but companies must encourage multiple employees to eventually contribute to the official blog.

    ...Subir

    Subir Ghosh | July 2008 | Mumbai, India

  • 3.Hi Shel,

    A bit late I know but just wanted thought I'd comment as we're looking at setting up our corporate blog as we speak.

    Your thoughts on group blogging really rang true with me and, whilst I agree with Subir's comments, I think it's even more important to use this option as it allows those reading and commenting on the blog to identify with various people within the organisation. Whether that's having a question answered by the CEO or learning something with the graduate of the firm, I think it's always important to be able to identify with the blogger and a group effort ensures you're not selling yourself short.

    Thanks for the sound advice.

    Roger

    Roger Christie | July 2008 | Sydney, Australia

Comment Form

« Back