Libel threat a good reason to moderate comments
Last week I reacted to the notion that moderating blog comments is a fast path to annoying your readers. Comments to the post leaned toward moderation, but several—including some from people I respect deeply—opposed moderation on personal blogs, suggesting it’s up to the blogger to check comments frequently and weed out the spam. By allowing comments to appear instantly, commenters are happy while rapid reactive review of comments will keep the blog free of the unsavory stuff.
Among the reasons to moderate, I included the potential for a comment that libels someone else. Today, while checking the moderation queue on one of my blogs, I found this:
Name redacted is a thief and imposter take no note of him. He is a fly by night character that moves on as he owes money.
I don’t know the person being accused in this comment. He’s not mentioned in the post to which the comment was left. I’ve never heard of the person who left the comment.
I suppose it’s possible that the individual in question did blow off a debt and the person to whom he owed money is so upset that he’s leaving these comments on blogs everywhere. It’s also possible that the accusation is completely untrue and that this is a case of character assassination with a hidden motive.
Either way, if the comment were discovered on my blog, I could have been sued by the individual mentioned for libel. I might have been able to make the safe-harbor argument, but only after spending a considerable amount of money on attorneys and the like. In the U.S., anybody can sue anybody for anything. Deleting the post—even if I discovered it after it had been up only 10 or 15 minutes—would not save me from a lawsuit if it had been discovered in that time (or if it had been cached by Google, making it discoverable long after I’d removed it).
I’m genuinely sorry if comment moderation annoys any of my readers. I’ll keep doing it.
10/24/10 | 6 Comments | Libel threat a good reason to moderate comments